Default Avatar

zinvob

zinvob

About

Username
zinvob
Joined
Visits
0
Last Active
Roles
Members

Comments

  • How about default parameters, would make the changes smaller: constructor Create(CreateName: boolean = true); And then you could change it to false where you don't want to create the name. Or you should change your need for no name at some pla…
    in FR3 manual Comment by zinvob August 2004
  • Just make it virtual, and call it as the last thing inside the contructor. Then override it from every object that want's different name adjustments.
    in FR3 manual Comment by zinvob August 2004
  • Just delete the delphi32.dsk file from your Delphi#\Bin directory, and your good to go.
  • Why not. Whenever create is executed, the first thing it does is to create the instance. And the instance can be reached with the self pointer. If you have other problems, use class procedure. I can't see your problem. Only the fact that you call…
    in FR3 manual Comment by zinvob August 2004
  • and not just the bands, everything seems to need this one executed..
    in FR3 manual Comment by zinvob August 2004
  • Just read the programmer manual. Why don't you integrate the "CreateUniqueName" into the create of your band objects instead of having to call it whenever you create a new band.
    in FR3 manual Comment by zinvob August 2004
  • Or MadExcept, or with the ExceptionHandling that comes with JVCL (which is free). And I must say, FR3 looks very promizing. So I hope it reaches beta state very soon. Also I hope that I could be one of the beta testers.
  • Yes, and how many people do you know that uses QR4 I would say noone. And if anyone do, it's because they have done no research on the net, and had QR before. Everyone who uses FR does research on the net. But I agree that it can't cost 99$ …
  • Ok. Then the right increase would be 350%.. Because 2.52 has sources, run-time designer, scripts and dialog forms. That would mean that v.3 should be 3,5 times better than 2.52. And that would mean that we should have an extreme amount of new pos…
  • I think he is right. You will have problems selling it with source for more than 299$ if you want many customers. And very few serious developers buy components without sources. So the other options is not there. But I don't know exatly how mu…
  • Strange that someone still thinks components without source is ok. Noone knows how long the company delivering a component will exist. If the company stops to exist and you don't have the source, then you have a really big problem. Also, if the comp…
  • Noone buys components used in production without source. That's suicide.. So I can't see why you have other versions. Those who buy components without source are just plain stupid.
  • I won't do that. As long as I have the source, I'll always find out what to do with it And it would be nice to finally see something..
  • We don't need documentation, if that's what we're waiting for. We only need some good demo apps, covering most of the handling. Save the documentation for later, we want the goodies now
  • How is it going with the documentation and release?
  • battle, why are you nagging about the interfaces. It's not important with interfaces inside these components, as they are all owned eighter by FR or you form so they will take care of releasing your memory after use. And the automatic memory managem…
  • It's been in alfa state for some time now. Has it reached beta or final state yet? Some info on what you are working with right now would be very nice. Thanx
    in When? Comment by zinvob January 2004
  • markmark wrote:   Not every end user familiar with low-level SQL statement to change grouping in report End-user only familiar with user interface. would ver 3.0 support internal sort and group report automaticlly ? Thanks Markmark …