DX 10 Release version
How long, or by what cause, will DX 10 make it into Release?
Are there outstanding bugs, or are you letting a certain amount of time elapse before promoting it to Release?
I am asking because the last update was 9/14 and I cannot start using DX 10 until all vendor components have been updated to DX 10.
Are there outstanding bugs, or are you letting a certain amount of time elapse before promoting it to Release?
I am asking because the last update was 9/14 and I cannot start using DX 10 until all vendor components have been updated to DX 10.
Comments
Do you have the IDE Settings correctly set up (with "Embarcadero RAD Studio 10 Seattle" checked)? If not you mayn't be seeing these releases...
I am only seeing DX10 for current but not release.
See attachment of my product listing.
But is it a bug free version? Way back when XE7 came out I had PDF export problems with the "current" version. Since then I have assumed "current" meant, "work in progress" or like a waiting pin to for "test with time".
Am I wrong? Is it safe to use the "current" version? I have a mission critical system with not much luxury for failure.
Look at the release FR 5.3 bugfix list
[philosophy]
I get what you mean. Does the development team:
- apply the same rigour in testing to minor and patch releases as it does to major releases?
- just publish the latest harvest as "current" - as is?
For example the Jedi Project practice is (2) "stable" releases and "daily builds". I can think of a lot of other cases of this. Perfectly valid in a collaborative / open-source world.
But IME the FR team's practice is (1). The version numbering reflects more the delta in features / functionality. In our development we've not seen any difference in behaviour of our suite of programs since about 5.3.12. But that's fine for us.
That is not to say that all releases are perfect.
We did have an unhappy experience between 5.3.6 and 5.3.12 which almost required reversion to a previous release. As the FR website does not maintain multiple minor / patch versions, we do it ourselves. Hence the nervousness when 5.3.14 came out as the first RS10S compatible...
It all depends on how they balance the targeted testing and regression testing in the test-suite. Regression testing is expensive (especially if you do not have fully-automated test-beds), and some development-shops do a kind of risk-weighted prioritisation on testing to cut delays / costs. Even with the best Regression Test Suite human fallibility means that gaps in the test-cases / test-scripts can be missed until something breaks!
[philosophy/]
So it's your call, but I'd say 5.3.15 is looking good at OodnaData