Getting a Master-Detail report without design time datasource

Comments

• AlexTZ

  March 2010 edited 1:02AM

  Hello,
  

  wrote:

  using [B.COLUMNAME] in the report yields "B unknown in this context"

  Check that COLUMNAME exists in the B table. If you make a typo in the table/column name, you will get the compiler error.
  
  I recommend another (easier) way to create reports. You add a button (or menu item) in your application that calls the report designer:
  

      private void btnCreateNew_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
      {
        // create report instance
        Report report = new Report();
  
        // register the dataset
        report.RegisterData(Your_DataSet);
  
        // design the report
        report.Design();
  
        // free resources used by report
        report.Dispose();
      }
  

  
  Run the application and click the button. Create a new report and save it to a file. Note that you work with actual dataset, and can preview the report immediately.
  To run an existing report:
  

        // create report instance
        Report report = new Report();
  
        // load the existing report
        report.Load("report.frx");
  
        // register the dataset
        report.RegisterData(Your_DataSet);
  
        // run the report
        report.Show();
  
        // free resources used by report
        report.Dispose();
  

  
  Using this approach, you have the following advantages:
  - you work with "live" data and can run the preview while designing a report;
  - this code is no longer needed:

  db = (DataBand)rep.FindObject([NAME OF THE DATABAND]);
  db.DataSource = rep.GetDataSource([NAME OF THE TABLE]);
  

  
  This approach was used to create demo reports. All reports in the demo.exe were created in run-time. In case if you don't need run-time designer, you may remove the designer button from the production version.
• Matthias Fischaleck

  March 2010 edited 1:02AM

  This is going to be kind of hard as we are talking about a web application data backend here which is, essentially, "headless". I'll re-check the table name though
• Matthias Fischaleck

  March 2010 edited 1:02AM

  Table-name and column-name verified, double checked and confirmed as existing. COuld it be a problem in registering the datasource?
• AlexTZ

  March 2010 edited 1:02AM

  Could you make a simple test project for me and send it to tz@fast-report.com?
• Matthias Fischaleck

  March 2010 edited 1:02AM

  I'll have a go at it when i have the time, but that's unfortunately not likely to be soon
• Matthias Fischaleck

  March 2010 edited 1:02AM

  I pinned down the main problem in this.
  
  the databand was called "OrderPositions" and the Table was called "ORDERPOSITIONS", which FRNet got mixed up.
  
  Now i get the data in the report, question now is how do i establish the master-detail relation?
  right now i get all entries from the detail table for each master row.
  
  Is there a way to do this in this scenario (see first post)?
• Matthias Fischaleck

  March 2010 edited 1:02AM

  As an addition: The notation "B.A.COLUMNAME_IN_A" is working in the nested Databand
• AlexTZ

  March 2010 edited 1:02AM

  First you need to establish a relation between two DataTable's, then register the DataSet in a report. In this case FastReport will create the relation automatically. So you need to do this:
  

  // first create the relation
  parentColumn = ds.Tables["A"].Columns["INDEXCOLUMN"];
  childColumn = ds.Tables["B"].Columns["REF-INDEXCOLUMN"];
  dataRel = new DataRelation("parent2Child", parentColumn, childColumn);
  ds.Tables["B"].ParentRelations.Add(dataRel);
  
  // then register the data
  rep.RegisterData(ds);
  db = (DataBand)rep.FindObject([NAME OF THE DATABAND]);
  db.DataSource = rep.GetDataSource([NAME OF THE TABLE]);
  
• Matthias Fischaleck

  March 2010 edited March 2010

  well yes, this is exactly what is happenig... this is the code as-is:
  

                  //insert table relation (to be used by FR.NET)
                  parentColumn = ds.Tables["POSITIONS"].Columns["AUFTRAGID"];
                  childColumn = ds.Tables["ORDERPOSITIONS"].Columns["AUFTRAGID"];
                  dataRel = new DataRelation("parent2Child", parentColumn, childColumn);
                  ds.Tables["ORDERPOSITIONS"].ParentRelations.Add(dataRel);
                  ds.Relations.Add(dataRel);
  

  
  and in a seperate library, but with a 1:1 passed-through ds:
  
  (this happens inside a xml-linq statement, but the [B.A.A_COLUMN] test shows that it is basically working:
  

               rep.RegisterData(ds); //add runtime data
              
              //whip up data bindings
                  db = (DataBand)rep.FindObject(bandElem.Attribute("PositionsBand").Value);
                  db.DataSource = rep.GetDataSource(bandElem.Attribute("POSITIONS").Value);
                  db = (DataBand)rep.FindObject(bandElem.Attribute("OrderPositionsBand").Value);
                  db.DataSource = rep.GetDataSource(bandElem.Attribute("ORDERPOSITIONS").Value);
  

  (note that the original code does not carry actual strings but adds the right ones dynamically)
  
  still.. i get _all_ rows from the detail table but can access the master table in the nested databand. ( I get the correct related master entries to display in the nested "detail" databand)
• AlexTZ

  March 2010 edited 1:02AM

  Ok, I was able to reproduce this in a simple app.
  

        DataSourceBase parentDs = report.GetDataSource("Categories");
        DataSourceBase childDs = report.GetDataSource("Products");
        // enable both datasources
        parentDs.Enabled = true;
        childDs.Enabled = true;
        // enable the relation as well
        report.Dictionary.UpdateRelations();
        // bind databands to datasources
        (report.FindObject("Data1") as DataBand).DataSource = parentDs;
        (report.FindObject("Data2") as DataBand).DataSource = childDs;
  
• Matthias Fischaleck

  March 2010 edited 1:02AM

  the "report.Dictionary.UpdateRelations();" line fixed it. Thank you!
• Magezi Sagesse DRCONGO

  March 2015 edited 1:02AM

  AlexTZ wrote: »

  Ok, I was able to reproduce this in a simple app.
  

        DataSourceBase parentDs = report.GetDataSource("Categories");
        DataSourceBase childDs = report.GetDataSource("Products");
        // enable both datasources
        parentDs.Enabled = true;
        childDs.Enabled = true;
        // enable the relation as well
        report.Dictionary.UpdateRelations();
        // bind databands to datasources
        (report.FindObject("Data1") as DataBand).DataSource = parentDs;
        (report.FindObject("Data2") as DataBand).DataSource = childDs;
  

  Following what is above here is what I did:

   Dim colonneparent As DataColumn = Donnees.Tables("bons").Columns("bon")
              Dim colonnechild As DataColumn = Donnees.Tables("signataires").Columns("numero")
              Dim relationd As New DataRelation("relationop", colonneparent, colonnechild)
              Donnees.Tables("signataires").ParentRelations.Add(relationd)
  
  
              rapportcharge.RegisterData(Donnees)
  
              rapportcharge.Dictionary.UpdateRelations()
  
              rapportcharge.GetDataSource("bons").Enabled = True
              rapportcharge.GetDataSource("signataires").Enabled = True
  
              liste.DataSource = rapportcharge.GetDataSource("bons")
              signataires.DataSource = rapportcharge.GetDataSource("signataires")
  

  
  In vb.net but the probleme is with the method updateRelations; when I omit it data are being load in the correct order but all rows of the details datatable is are being show for every row of the master datatable; And When I put it data are being misordered (a value of the first row of master datatable is being printed on the second and so on) but the details rows that's appearing for each master row correspond to it.
  
  I don't understand how to deal with that methode. Is it good to create the relation on the datatable(code) in or directly using the datasource of the report(report )